JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 6, 2002

A- de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Cristina Duarte Ardila

✓
Topic · hard data
Correccion Algunas Expresiones Sentencia T-1342/00
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

The case-law reporter has not yet indexed topics for this decision. The summary below describes what it is about.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se realizó la corrección de algunas expresiones de la Sentencia T-1342/01 de conformidad como se explica a continuación: En la primera página en donde figura “La Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional”, debe aparecer “La Sala Octava de Revisión”.

En el numeral segundo de la parte resolutiva de la Sentencia, en lugar de “María Patricia Ardila Vásquez”, debe figurar “María Patricia Ardila Name”.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Corregir algunas expresiones de la Sentencia T-1342 de 2001 de conformidad como se explica a continuación:
  2. 1. En la primera página en donde figura "La Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional", debe aparecer "La Sala Octava de Revisión".
  3. 2. En el numeral
  4. segundo. de la parte resolutiva de la Sentencia, en lugar de "María Patricia Ardila Vásquez", debe figurar "María Patricia Ardila Name".
  5. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela